The Big Bang Theory and Chaucer’s Miller’s Tale: Representations of the Medieval Period in Popular MediaPosted: October 14, 2012
Recently I was watching an episode of The Big Bang Theory and I was quite surprised to come across a reference to Geoffrey Chaucer. In this particular episode Penny is having a girls’ night at her apartment and the intellectually gifted but socially awkward Amy Farrah Fowler recites Chaucer’s Miller’s Tale as her example of a dirty story, prompting Penny to respond with ‘What the hell was that?’.
The Big Bang Theory – Chaucer’s The Miller’s Tale
Film and Television are interesting media as they both reflect and have the power to affect contemporary society, thus I began to think about how the Medieval period (and its literature) is depicted on screen and, in turn, how this reflects and/or shapes the general public’s perceptions of these periods. How does the general public imagine the Middle Ages? For instance, how does this little scene from The Big Bang Theory reflect (and propagate) ideas surrounding Medieval Literature?
One of the prime sources of comedy in The Big Bang Theory comes from the dichotomy between the nerdy, socially inept people (all with varying degrees of social ineptitude) like Sheldon and Leonard and the ‘normal’ people, namely Penny. Typically, the language that defines this dichotomy is scientific (although it can also be comic book or video-game related). Whenever Sheldon, a theoretical physicist and the nerdiest, most socially inept person in his group, mentions anything scientific it seems like he is speaking a foreign language and thus placing the viewers without expertise in physics onto the other side of the divide between nerds and normal people.
In the aforementioned scene, Chaucer’s Miller’s Tale is firmly situated on the nerdy side of the dichotomy. Amy Farrah Fowler, socially inept neuroscientist, makes Chaucer’s Middle English as indecipherable as Sheldon’s theoretical physics. If the viewer was in any doubt as to where Middle English literature belonged, all they need to do is note the laugh track and Penny’s reaction – ‘What the hell was that?’ Penny is not impressed; obviously she did not understand the bawdy tale! Interestingly, Bernadette, a PhD student and waitress, bridges the two by commenting: ‘I thought it was pretty spicy, especially the part where he kisses her nether ye.’ Yet, although she bridges the gulf between the socially challenged nerds and the socially adept Penny, she is still highly educated, nearing the end of her PhD – a degree of education that most people don’t attain.
So how does this reflect popular ideas about medieval literature? Are works like The Miller’s Tale by Geoffrey Chaucer unapproachable? Is it just for geeky professionals? Is it just someone like Amy Farrah Fowler who would enjoy it? How should ‘normal’ people react to it? If the very normal Penny, a socially competent waitress, isn’t interested in Chaucer – does that mean that understanding Chaucer’s works, like understanding very complicated Theoretical Physics, is limited to a select group of professionals at a university? What is its purpose in the quotidian world? Why study English Literature, or, the question that infuriates all arts students, what’s the purpose of an arts degree?
By placing Middle English onto the ‘geeky’ side of the dichotomy, represented through Amy Farrah Fowler, the general public are alienated from Chaucer’s work. The idea that Medieval literature is inaccessible for ‘normal’ people is reflected and communicated through Penny’s reaction to the risqué Miller’s Tale. I wish that Amy Farrah Fowler didn’t recite The Miller’s Tale so quickly, that it took up more than a minute in a thirty minute show, because many who watch The Big Bang Theory and wouldn’t dream of reading Chaucer might find themselves pleasantly surprised. Yet the show, which I must admit I love, allies the viewer with Penny. The laugh track tells the audience who to side with and that Amy Farrah Fowler is to be laughed at.